Enabling Financial Liberty


 

Enabling Financial Liberty
Graphic courtesy of ChatGPT

April 2022

The Savvy RE Investor

www.theSavvyREInvestor.com

 

“Economic freedom is … an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom.”

Milton Friedman

What is financial liberty?

Probably the most fundamental, and overlooked, principle of the system of capitalism is that it is driven by uncoerced exchanges.  The lack of coercion is what makes free enterprise actually free. As soon as coercion is present, they system is no longer free.

Financial liberty is having the ability to use your financial resources according to your own best judgement and your own priorities. This includes freedom from being coerced into providing your financial resources for others to use.

The Institute for Justice defines economic liberty as “the right to earn a living in the occupation of your choice without unnecessary government interference.”[1] (The Institute for Justice, 2022). We would add to that the right to enjoy the fruits of your labors without unnecessary government interference.

Some will undoubtedly read these definitions and proclaim them selfish, self-centered, and stingy. While they are inarguably self-centered, whether or not it is selfish or stingy depends entirely on the priorities of the individual when they use their wealth.

Critics of capitalism and economic liberty project their own rapacious natures onto others and erroneously proclaim that wealth is accumulated only by stealing it from others.  They incorrectly assume that we are locked into a zero-sum game where I can only get more by making sure you have less. Perhaps they don’t put it this way, but they fundamentally believe that wealth is like matter and energy in its nature.  It is neither created, nor destroyed, only transformed.  This view transforms the wealth cycle into an exercise in the “law of the jungle” where the strong survive by eating the weak.

There are at least two, probably more, fundamental flaws in these assumptions.  The first is the zero-sum.

The Failure of Zero-Sum Game Thinking

Critics of capitalism and economic liberty point to some traditional Christian ideas which conflict directly with science and use that conflict to dismiss many true principles.

Many in the traditional Judeao-Christian tradition believe that the story of the creation of the Heavens and Earth, as described in the Book of Genesis appears to show God creating something out of nothing.  The Apostle Paul, before his conversion to Christianity, was known as Saul of Tarsus and he was thoroughly educated in the Jewish traditions and scripture.  In his Letter to the Hebrews he tells them, “… the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.” (Hebrews 11:3)

Paul knew that simply because something was not visible, did not mean it did not exist.  In January of 2022 Space.com declared, “Over 80% of all matter in the universe is made up of material scientists have never seen.”

Since the 1830’s Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are explicitly taught that the earth was “organized”, formed from unorganized matter.  Scientific descriptions of interstellar creative processes support that view as we see clouds of dust and gasses pulled together by gravitational forces until they are compressed enough to explode into stars, which in shape the remnants of those clouds into planets.

The first failing of those who embrace the zero-sum game is that their understanding of the size of the pie they think we are fighting over is much larger, more abundant, and more creative than they have ever imagined.  To push the pie analogy, they see the pie in front of them and imagine that is all the pie that exists. They utterly fail to see the endless fields of wheat and orchards of trees which supply us more flour and fruit than all of us together could make into pies if we labored day and night without rest.  They are starving in the midst of plenty.

How Wealth is Created

The second failure of these critics is their misunderstanding of how wealth is created.

They think wealth is created by the delivery of objects in your hands.  That is wrong. The object in your hand is the very last vestige and nearly the least important part of wealth creation.

Wealth creation is not driven by things. Wealth creation is driven by ideas. And, who has the sight to see to the very end of that expansive resource?  In fact, the very nature of ideas is the total opposite of the zero-sum game.

In the zero-sum game if I have a pie and give it to you, then I have none.  However, if I have an idea and give it to you, I still have the idea, and now you do too. What is more, when I give you my idea you might add to it your idea and make my idea even better, and now we both have an improved idea.

This is the true genesis of wealth. It comes from ideas.  Ideas get improved and eventually turned into goods and services which people value enough to trade for some portion of their material goods.

Quite literally, wealth is created out of thin air. Ideas are the very essence of “thin air.”  They are utterly insubstantial and ephemeral until first put into words, and then into actions. Every entrepreneur begins with an idea, which they eventually turn into an enterprise that provides value to others.

The Wealth Cycle

The Wealth Cycle attempts to describe the relationship and flow of money during the life of a person. The underlying assumption of most financial advisors is that this wealth cycle is largely linear and is focused on the lifetime of a single person.  However, that view is short-sighted and self-centered. Because of its short frame of reference, it fails to serve people as it could.

There are four distinct activities which comprise the Wealth Cycle.  They are:

A)     Wealth Creation

B)     Wealth Accumulation

C)     Wealth Preservation

D)     Wealth Distribution

In the traditional view, the first two are synonymous. As you will see, when it comes to financial liberty, they are not, and perhaps never have been.

Wealth Creation

In the context of financial liberty, the creation of wealth is driven by finding a way to provide something of value to others (Acres of Diamonds) and making it accessible to them after making them aware of it.

In business terms this is about creating the need through marketing and then fulfilling the need through sales.

While marketing and sales are relatively well-known processes and have many expert practitioners, it is extremely challenging for most of us to truly figure out what those around us need and will value enough to make it worth our while to bring to them.

When Apple Computer and MicroSoft were founded, very few people had any idea that they needed what those teams were about to bring to them.  Today it is almost unimaginable to consider life without personal computing.

Wealth Accumulation

Wealth Accumulation means building up a surplus. Initially, your surplus is there to tide you over if you hit a financial rough patch.  It means having enough money to pay all your bills for a week, a month, three months, even if you have no income.

Living without a financial safety margin is stressful. It is living on the edge of losing everything. Unfortunately, many people are less than four new tires away from bankruptcy.

Many entrepreneurs working hard to turn their ideas into wealth have to shut their doors.

Meaningful Wealth Accumulation is when you have a large enough amount of wealth that you can pay your bills for the rest of your life without having to earn a paycheck to do it.

Significant Wealth Accumulation is when you have enough that you, and your loved ones can pay their bills for the rest of their lives without having to earn a paycheck to do it.

To be clear, the ability to pay your bills without having to earn a paycheck is not necessarily the same thing as not working. First, when you have attained significant amounts of wealth you must work diligently to preserve it. Second, everyone, without exception, needs to invest time and energy in something that is bigger than their own self-preservation, a cause greater than themselves.  When your wealth allows you to no longer invest most of your time in earning the money you need to make your ends meet, you have more time and energy to focus on something more enduring than yourself. It is this reason that drives many of the wealthiest people to become philanthropists. They seek out ways to use their wealth to make the lives of less fortunate people a bit better.

The people of the United States of America are, as a people, the most wealthy in the world. If you are fortunate enough to be born in this country, then you are automatically among the 1% most wealthy people in the world. In 2020 Americans gave $471.44 billion to charities. With a GDP of $20.94 trillion that same year that is an uncoerced offering of more than 2% of every dollar they earned. In 2020, according to Forbes magazine the most generous countries in the world were (in order) Ireland, USA, UK, Canada, and Australia.  All of those are, by anyone’s standards, wealthy, capitalist countries.

Wealth Preservation

In the generally accepted theory of the Wealth Cycle, protection of your wealth is correctly recognized as an activity rather than a phase.  If you fail to protect what you have, it will go away, or be taken away.  This is illustrated as simply as the furniture in your home. If you put all that furniture outside in a vacant lot, if no one steals it, the weather and bugs will destroy it. However, if you keep it inside your house, it is preserved or protected from the weather, and bugs, and thieves.  You must give at least as much consideration to protecting your wealth as you do the protection of your furniture.

Unfortunately for many of us, we are the single biggest threat to our wealth. We want to spend it. In fact, we must spend it. If we don’t spend some portion of it, we won’t have any furniture, or a home to live in, or food to eat. Preserving our wealth is first about controlling our own spending habits. Living within our means.

The second biggest threat to our wealth, again comes from ourselves. Making good investments is not an easy task. If we make bad investments, our wealth can evaporate almost before our very eyes. InvestTools teaches people that they must let their winners run and cut their loser short. This is a wealth preservation strategy.  Without using it, your bad investments will likely leave you broke and hinder your ability to make good investments which might preserve or grow your wealth.

The third biggest threat to our wealth is theft.

There are lots of folks who want to steal your wealth. They will scam it out of you, litigate it out of you, tax it out of you, and sometimes legislate it out of you.  While each of these different sorts of threats to your wealth requires different means to protect your wealth, the threats from sovereign authority in the form of taxation and legislation are far more powerful, dangerous, far-reaching, and difficult to combat than all the scammers, thieves, and greedy litigants put together.  In combatting those latter threats, the power of the State is on your side.  In combatting predation by taxation and legislation the power of the State is against you.

Government is the only thief you cannot throw in jail.

I recently listened to an interview where a successful investor shared how he had used a strategy to accumulate some very valuable investment positions.  Before he could translate those positions into his wealth preservation space, the US Government changed some rules and, with the stroke of a pen, made his positions illegal and wiped out the wealth he had accumulated in them.

Increasingly, ordinary people find that the biggest threat to their wealth building is the very government that is supposed to be protecting their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Prior to the 1960’s the fiscal philosophy of the US Government was that the money belonged to the people who earned it and the government would exist on what the people could spare it.  During the Kennedy Administration, that philosophy was upended. From then until now the fiscal philosophy in the halls of government is that the money belongs to the government and the people will exist on what the government decides they need.

The only way to keep government from confiscating your wealth is to keep it where they cannot readily lay hands on it. In the past, this meant converting wealth into portable forms like gold and jewels and putting wealth in places that were physically secure. While that can be done today to a limited degree, with the advent of cryptocurrency, digital wallets (see Appendix A: Short Primer on Cryptographic Wallets) have arisen as the most secure and portable way to keep your wealth from thieves. Even if your digital wallet falls into the hands of others, without the cryptographic key, they cannot open it. In fact, if you lose your key, you cannot open it.

Wealth Distribution

In the traditional view of the Wealth Cycle, this is focused on living off your wealth in retirement and passing you wealth on to the next generation. Unfortunately, this view of life as a waterfall where your existence flows down to the ocean (and beach!) at the end ignores the reality that your wealth is being distributed from the very moment it is created or accumulated. Sometimes even before then.

Every day as you live your life, whether you are working or retired, you are consuming (distributing to yourself) a portion of your wealth. If you don’t, you die of starvation. Your family probably dies, or leaves you too, to find someone who will provide for them.

Wealth Distribution is not a phase at the end of the Wealth Cycle.  It is an ongoing activity throughout your life.

Predatory Government

From the standpoint of economic liberty, Communism, in all its forms and derivations is the most predatory form of government. A central tenet of communism is that personal property is not allowed. The State owns absolutely everything. All the fruits of labor and production are owned by the State and are dispensed to the individuals according to their needs, as determined by representatives of the State.

Most communism is most often seen in the guise of Socialism. Socialism is a tacit acknowledgment that no bureaucracy can effectively provide for the detailed management of each individual life and needs. Under Socialism there is a very limited amount of personal property allowed and a minimal degree of economic liberty. Workers (and non-workers) are paid a symbolic wage or stipend which they can use to purchase food, clothing, and a limited array of other material goods from State operated outlets. Thus, they have enough economic liberty to choose if they prefer to buy food, clothes, or booze. Under Socialism all the means of production (enterprises) are owned and operated by the State.

Fascism is a form of Socialism which allows for the limited existence and semi-independent operation of business enterprises which are not wholly owned by the State. These enterprises are closely regulated and are allowed to continue only as long they serve faithfully as a privatized form of enforcement of the State.  Individual economic liberty is greater under Fascism than under either Communism or Socialism.  However, what the individual can do with their private property and wealth is tightly monitored and controlled by the State and may, at any moment, be wholly or partially confiscated by the State at the whim of bureaucrats.

Democratic Socialism is, in fact, either Communism, Socialism, of Fascism, depending upon the degree of economic control the democratically elected socialists decide to implement.

It is important to note that a government can support a mixture of capitalism and communism. Accordingly, a government which does not openly declare itself adherent to Communist principles can implement policies and practices which limit economic liberty in ways that are entirely consistent with any of the degrees of Communism.  In fact, in the United States of America today we see a great many Communist-consistent laws, regulations, and practices.  Nearly all of these have been put in place under the guise of protecting the natural rights of the citizens, while in fact depriving them of those rights.

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) is an excellent case in point.  Signed into law in 1970, ostensibly to uncover the financial activities of illegal drug dealers as they attempt to transform the (untaxedx) proceeds from their sales of illegal drugs into ‘clean’ money which could be used to invest and pay taxes.  BSA compels financial institutions to spy on the financial dealings of their customers without need for probable cause or a warrant. On a daily basis they report transactions and customers which the Government has categorically defined as “suspicious.” Again, this reporting is compelled by law without regard to the rights of citizens against unreasonable searches as guaranteed by the 4th Amendment and searches without a warrant as required under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.

If a financial institution fails to report these transactions in an accurate and timely manner the business will be penalized and responsible individuals can be both fined personally, and thrown in jail.

After the terrorist attacks on the USA by Al Queda in September of 2001, in October of that same year Congress passed (and President George W Bush signed into law) The USA Patriot Act, again under the premise that it was needed to protect the natural rights of Americans to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The act authorized additional financial and electronic spying on Americans in the form of regulations affected all Americans without the need for individual warrants and probable cause.

Since 1997 the Cato Institute has periodically published the results of a survey of world conditions about economic freedom (Hanke & Walters, 1997). In this survey they establish a criteria defining economic freedom, they consider the effects of economic freedom, and they rank countries around the world according to their criteria of economic freedom.

Their findings indicate that per capita income and life expectancy have a “positive linkage.”

They differentiate between economic freedom and political or civil liberty. “Political liberty is present when citizens are free to participate in the political process on an equitable basis, there is meaningful competition in the political sphere, and elections are free and fair. Civil liberties include protection against unreasonable searches, access to fair trials, and rights of free assembly, expression, and practice of religion.”

They go on to note, “a country may be ‘free’ or ‘democratic’ in a civil or political sense, but lack economic freedom. At the same time, a country may lack political or civil liberties, yet possess abundant economic freedom.”

They identify the following four primary characteristics of economic liberty:

1.      Secure rights to property (legally acquired);

2.      Freedom to engage in voluntary transactions, inside and outside a nation’s borders;

3.      Freedom from governmental control of the terms on which individuals transact; and

4.      Freedom from governmental expropriation of property (e.g., by confiscatory taxation or unanticipated inflation).

They conclude, “these elements prescribe an important but balanced role for government. The institutions of government will create and enhance economic freedom by making and enforcing rules governing behavior in the economic sphere—e.g., by preventing Paul from stealing Peter’s property. But government might also diminish economic freedom by itself robbing Peter, whether to pay Paul or achieve some other objective.”

Starting in 1994, the Heritage Foundation began to publish an annual Index of Economic Freedom. In 1996 the USA was in the top 10 in three different surveys of economic liberty[2]. In 2022 (Heritage Foundation, 2022) the United States of America didn’t even make it into the top 10, or the top 20. We came in at 25th place, and the survey indicates our numbers are trending downward.

Money Supply and Economic Liberty

Fiat currency[3] is designed to be manipulated by the sovereign to allow them to inflate the currency over time so that they can pay off debts later more cheaply. When the sovereign inflates the currency, they remove buying power and rob currency holders in the process.  This is true of all fiat currencies.

"One danger of fiat money is that governments will print too much of it, resulting in hyperinflation."

James Chen

The primary mechanism used to control the value of fiat currency is the monetary supply. The more scarce the money, the greater its value. The more abundant, the less its value. During the COVID Pandemic the Federal Reserve of the USA has increased the money supply to more than $6 trillion. Since 2020 they monetary supply increased from 4 to 6 trillion. Such significant and sudden growth in the supply of any fiat currency cannot occur without triggering significant inflation, and perhaps hyperinflation. It is arguable that such a significant increase would cause any currency to suffer inflation.

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated

Figure 1 25 Year History of USD Money Supply[4]

During the era of the Spanish conquest of the Americas, Spain used specie[5] currency of gold and silver coins. The gold and silver Spain brought back from the Americas flooded Europe with an abundance of something that had been scarce.  This made gold and silver less valuable, which drove prices upward. In other words, the abundance of money (gold and silver) caused inflation. “Too many people with too much money chased too few goods” (Wikipedia, 2022)

At a summit of actuaries in 2013, Martin Hickling blatantly stated that “increases in the supply of money can be seen as a form of property theft.” (Hickling, 2013)  He is not the first to give voice to this view.

“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.”

John Maynard Keynes (Keynes, 1919)

What adds insult to this injury is that “while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.”[6] What makes this idea more insidious still is that Keynes was agreeing with the notions Lenin was proposing as a means to destroy the “Capitalist System.” Once again we see that Communism is at the heart of this systemic threat to economic liberty.

When BitCoin (BTC) was launched, a prominent objective was the ability to store value and be impervious to inflation. This is to be accomplished by enforcing scarcity, limiting the total number of BTC to 21 million coins (Nakamoto, 2008).

CuBit™ and TWPRR™

During the US Civil War, when Union Troops entered South Carolina (and in some other parts of the Confederate States) they made it a point to destroy county courthouses along with their land records. This was seen as a way to indirectly confiscate the wealth of the Southern aristocracy. If they could not prove their ownership of land, others could lay claim to it without the interference of substantiated public records.

In the coming storm it may be that CuBit™ becomes an important store of wealth. It may also be that The Worldwide Property Rights Registry™ (TWPRR™) becomes a critical store of information about the ownership of real estate[7]. Wars often destroy many important records. The distributed ledgers of blockchain technology represent an opportunity to create a disaster-resistant store of information which may be critical to rebuilding a society in the wake of natural or man-made disasters.

While we think that sovereign records are something government would naturally move to protect, that thinking is based on the assumption that government is not actively trying to destroy private ownership of property. A common theme in Communist and Socialist governments is the abolition of private property. Destroying ownership records is an indirect way to help bring that about.

If we can get enough sovereigns to use SovereignDirt, the distributed nature of blockchain may preserve those records, regardless of how many county courthouses are destroyed.

Conclusions

"Liberty has never come from Government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it."

Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States of America

The single greatest threat to financial liberty is rapidly becoming the State. 

The government of the United States of America was established for the express purposes of securing the liberty of the People.  For much of its history it has been true to that charter.  However, in recent years the government has been taken over by degrees with views that are envious and covetous of private wealth. This poisonous elixir is transforming our government from a protector of financial liberty into a predator seeking to take control of both the means of production and the wealth those means produce.

As Milton Friedman notes, economic freedom is foundational to political freedom.  While we engage in a struggle for liberty at the ballot box, those who cherish freedom must also take reasonable measures to protect their wealth against unreasonable search and seizure by a predatory government. Because the government has co-opted banks into becoming an enforcement arm of the fiscal policies of the US Government, those institutions can no longer play a significant role in your efforts to preserve your wealth.

When did it become the right of government to know every aspect of your financial world? The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has determined that income taxes are constitutional and the 16th Amendment to the Constitution made is so when it was ratified in 1913. Does the lawful nature of income tax give government the right to search your financial records without warrant or due process? It does not. And yet, that is where we are today. Through its private proxies, the banks, the US Government monitors every transaction you make that approaches or exceed $10,000.  As though a major transaction is probable cause for warrantless surveillance.

While we believe that it is appropriate for citizens to honestly declare their incomes for purposes of taxation, it is manifestly not appropriate for citizens to supinely place their wealth on a proverbial doorstep for the government, or others, to confiscate at their whim and will. Government has increasingly shown an ability and willingness to avoid or pervert due process of law to confiscate the wealth of citizens. It is not now, nor ever has been the duty of citizens to submit to the will of a predatory government, regardless of the social elements which may support such measures. The majority of the mob demanded the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth at the hands of the Romans. Neither their number, nor their volume made their demands moral or right.

The Constitution of the United States and The Bill of Rights established a structure of government that generally thwarted the unrighteous will of both the minority and the majority in their efforts to oppress the “other.” The chief principle it used to do this is the very limited rights ceded by the People to the government. At least since the days of President Wilford Woodruff those constitutional principles have been under attack by many who have expressly sworn oaths to defend it. We, here in the 21st Century stand in the path of a wave of tyranny that has been building within our country for more than 100 years. It remains to be seen if we will be up to the challenge to preserve our liberties for ourselves, much less for the next generation.

In our parent’s day millions of citizens went to war in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific Islands to directly combat the forces of fascism which sought to dominate the world.  After World War II the struggle continued in a “Cold War” which finally seemed at an end with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Unfortunately, the seeds of Communist tyranny, like tares amid the wheat, have been sown in the fields “behind the lines.” The Communistic Hippies of the 1960’s now hold the reigns of power in Washington and for decades now have overrun the halls of academia. They have indoctrinated many citizens and our children to believe that the oppression and poverty of Communism is good and the freedom and prosperity of Capitalism is bad.

To stand, and to win, in the face of such forces requires not only wit and resolve, it requires financial resources. If we cannot maintain our economic liberty, it is doubtful we will have the means to maintain our political liberty.

Who today can say that CuBit™ and TWPRR™ will not play a significant role in preserving economic liberty through the perilous times to come? What great good might we be unwittingly conferring on the future by standing these up now?

References

Chen, J. (2021, October 26). Fiat Money. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fiatmoney.asp#:~:text=Key%20Takeaways-,Fiat%20money%20is%20a%20government%2Dissued%20currency%20that%20is%20not,U.S.%20dollar%2C%20are%20fiat%20currencies.

Crypto Pro. (2022). 5 Types of Cryptocurrency Wallets: Comparison. Retrieved from CryptoPro.com: https://cryptopro.app/cryptocurrency-wallet-types/

Hanke, S. H., & Walters, J. K. (1997). ECONOMIC FREEDOM, PROSPERITY, AND EQUALITY: A SURVEY. Cato Journal, 17(2). Retrieved from https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1997/11/cj17n2-1.pdf

Heritage Foundation. (2022). 2022 Index of Economic Freedom. Retrieved from Heritage.org: https://www.heritage.org/index/

Hickling, M. (2013). Inflation and Other Risks of Unsound Money. Sydney, Australia.

Keynes, J. M. (1919). The Economic Consequences of the Peace. London: Macmillan & Co, Limited.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Bitcoin.com. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

The Institute for Justice. (2022). Economic Liberty. Retrieved from The Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/issues/economic-liberty/

Wikipedia. (2022, 4 4). Price Revolution. Retrieved from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_revolution#

 


Endnotes


[2] (Hanke & Walters, 1997) pg 13.

[3] Fiat money is a government-issued currency that is not backed by a commodity such as gold. Fiat money gives central banks greater control over the economy because they can control how much money is printed. Most modern paper currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, are fiat currencies. (Chen, 2021)

[4] https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m0# using the 25 year view with the Y-axis in millions of USD.

[5] Specie currency is valuable because the currency is shaped from a valuable commodity. In the case of Spain, it was gold and silver.

[6] (Keynes, 1919) pg 290

[7] For more on CuBit™ and TWPRR™ see https://CuBitREvolution.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Accidental Socialist

Currency Collapse is Coming